From owner-freebsd-hardware Sat Sep 12 16:23:07 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA24420 for freebsd-hardware-outgoing; Sat, 12 Sep 1998 16:23:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from whizzo.transsys.com (whizzo.TransSys.COM [144.202.42.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA24414 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 1998 16:23:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from louie@whizzo.transsys.com) Received: from whizzo.transsys.com (localhost.transsys.com [127.0.0.1]) by whizzo.transsys.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA00918; Sat, 12 Sep 1998 19:22:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from louie@whizzo.transsys.com) Message-Id: <199809122322.TAA00918@whizzo.transsys.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Duncan Barclay cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Louis A. Mamakos" Subject: Re: "Cacheable memory"?? References: In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 12 Sep 1998 21:21:59 BST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1998 19:22:50 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id QAA24416 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > PS. In the end I went for a TX MB, at the time the only Super 7 boards were > MVP3 in the UK and where a bit flaky. The Tx had the advantage of being dirt > cheap and providing me with lots of PCI and no AGP (I have a nice Millenium > which would be a shame to waste). But this only supports 64MB of (cachable) memory, right? I'm thinking about picking up a K6-2 and new motherboard, and while the TX-based motherboards seem very popular and attractive due to the PCI slot count, the memory limitation is of concern to me. louie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message