From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 20 02:24:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 648C916A403; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:24:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (it.buh.tecnik93.com [81.196.204.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5011243CAF; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:23:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B869117132; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 04:02:50 +0200 (EET) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 04:02:50 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu To: infofarmer@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20061220040250.3bca67cb@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: References: <200612192119.kBJLJ6vE038989@repoman.freebsd.org> <20061219232850.BF91B3A5BF@cherenkov.geekfire.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_NveU2VuFMxk/v45pum=4FyK"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: Alexander Botero-Lowry , sat@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/eyeos Makefile distinfo pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:24:06 -0000 --Sig_NveU2VuFMxk/v45pum=4FyK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:55:45 +0300 "Andrew Pantyukhin" wrote: > On 12/20/06, Alexander Botero-Lowry wrote: > > > sat 2006-12-19 21:19:05 UTC > > > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > > > Modified files: > > > www/eyeos Makefile distinfo pkg-plist > > > Log: > > > - Update to 0.9.3-5.wink.at.nivit.;) > > > > Approved by: nivit ? > > > > When committing to another person's port that you're not the > > maintainer of, you need to put approved by, even if the approval is > > implicit. That's what (implicit) is for. >=20 > This makes no sense at all. My mission is to confuse > people, not enlighten them. [ .. ] C'mon. Did nivit approve you commit explicitly ? If yes, an 'Approved by; nivit' should be in the commit log. If not, did he gave you a blanket approval to commit to his port ? Then alexbl is right. Else you shouldn't have commited. We just had "commits w/o maintainer approval" discussion on ports@ And, oh, please, let's end this here. --=20 IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" BOFH excuse #319: Your computer hasn't been returning all the bits it gets from the --Sig_NveU2VuFMxk/v45pum=4FyK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFiJnKBX6fi0k6KXsRAk4dAJ44PDppccSp1y1Gcg8I4n39jajGDgCfekoU nN7Rsd+lM57xNsO54iIOcxw= =ktE7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_NveU2VuFMxk/v45pum=4FyK--