From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 07:44:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E89A106566C for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 07:44:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from appdebgr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40818FC0A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 07:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so201327qyk.13 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 00:44:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=w4SGeOIFtNn/AELkauKfb3TDrhuqEYfUhyllEAcQGmg=; b=j9uLChnJZuCAtfmDW2OJZVEyPgIacR5OUC8c3FS9WGY2HRKoMHxtWRXPI23nuTBfSA rSguCVkswtwoTki4hBry1MeZ0nQTDeINFBjRVxZGM/nD4Ra9DwT1I85+yhHdZ83shDNp BqWPzSnbgx6B9FRF5WwaDSiqYTzQJFtwWROEw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ZT81GEJore9kJgzYuMfovYeHDWI4+O8jjU8FWB185SZRhu4EFrYlTI2+sVzEE7L8hi wacPfgIivdo45Qi+fcClfekL1iEXgwjfrhRNJzGEbPZoPpknReepRHpf+vJx3oTg4SS3 lFjUoOABATF8ktIKcHxwskzqpZiGWXJ/nAUC0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.181.12 with SMTP id bw12mr2775785qcb.249.1289027765754; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 00:16:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.88.212 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 00:16:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CD4DD2C.1090407@too1337.com> References: <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> <4CD4DD2C.1090407@too1337.com> Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 09:16:05 +0200 Message-ID: From: App Deb To: Steven Susbauer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 07:44:40 -0000 On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Steven Susbauer wrote: > Android uses the Java language, but this is not what that suit is about. > Oracle claims the Dalvik VM infringes on their patents. If Android was using > the Java VM there would be no lawsuit. Sun was able to successfully sue > Microsoft for similar reasons in 1997 (incomplete implementation of the Java > standard). Somehow people continued using Java, despite this. Actually they were not. If I remember correctly, the Microsoft Java VM was abandoned because of this and everyone had to switch to the Sun one.