From owner-freebsd-doc Wed Sep 8 20: 1:14 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A12315273 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 1999 20:01:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id UAA48938; Wed, 8 Sep 1999 20:00:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 20:00:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199909090300.UAA48938@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Cc: From: Jim Mock Subject: Re: docs/7456 Reply-To: Jim Mock Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR docs/7456; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jim Mock To: Nik Clayton Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, seggers@semyam.dinoco.de Subject: Re: docs/7456 Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 12:51:42 +1000 On Wed, 08 Sep 1999 at 23:12:21 +0100, Nik Clayton wrote: > On Wed, Sep 08, 1999 at 09:45:36PM +1000, Jim Mock wrote: > > Can this be closed now? > > Pass. Does the new version of libdialog that's been imported since > the PR fix the problem? > > It's not what I'd call a critical PR, so we can probably take lack > of feedback as "yes, it's fine" (or, alternatively, "it might be > fine, but we don't care"). > > I'd be slightly happier if someone actually stood up and said the > problem has gone away though. Agreed. I'll hold off on closing it in hopes Stefan lets us know one way or the other. Stefan? -- - Jim Mock - jim@blues.ghis.net - systems administrator - ghis.NET - - work: http://www.ghis.net/ - personal: http://www.ghis.net/~jim/ - - FreeBSD 'zine: http://www.freebsdzine.org/ - jim@freebsdzine.org - - The FreeBSD Project -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - jim@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message