Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 31 Aug 2017 14:45:09 -0500
From:      Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
To:        Martin Simmons <martin@lispworks.com>
Cc:        <freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: ENAMETOOLONG?
Message-ID:  <F848F587-8CA9-48A9-89EF-7B5E8097528A@lerctr.org>
In-Reply-To: <14F658A8-23DB-49DF-9AA3-5BD45BA26BEA@lerctr.org>
References:  <20170822141419.v6ely424bjvcnzoj@lrosenman.local> <201708231238.v7NCc4f7008608@higson.cam.lispworks.com> <14F658A8-23DB-49DF-9AA3-5BD45BA26BEA@lerctr.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/23/17, 9:15 AM, "Larry Rosenman" <owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org on behalf of ler@lerctr.org> wrote:

    
    
    
    On 8/23/17, 7:38 AM, "Martin Simmons" <martin@lispworks.com> wrote:
    
        >>>>> On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 09:14:19 -0500, Larry Rosenman said:
        > 
        > Are there plans to increase the max length for zfs?
        > 
        > [1239928] ZFS WARNING: Unable to create ZVOL zroot/vm-bhyve/freebsd11/disk0@zfs-auto-snap_hourly-2017-08-22-09h00 (error=63).
        
        I think this is hitting the limit on SPECNAMELEN when it tries to create the
        device node.
        
        __Martin
        
    
    Any chance of that limit be increased?


Any takers?

sys/sys/param.h:#define SPECNAMELEN	63		/* max length of devicename */

 





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F848F587-8CA9-48A9-89EF-7B5E8097528A>