Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 7 Jun 2008 14:00:39 -0700
From:      Jo Rhett <jrhett@netconsonance.com>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Chris Marlatt <cmarlatt@rxsec.com>
Subject:   Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3
Message-ID:  <BBA9BC48-8ECB-4956-A7F5-70F81BB1E548@netconsonance.com>
In-Reply-To: <484821EE.5070303@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <9B7FE91B-9C2E-4732-866C-930AC6022A40@netconsonance.com>	<4846D849.2090005@FreeBSD.org>	<4846E14C.709@FreeBSD.org>	<AC78CAC0-BA7C-4A20-9BEE-E7E37FD225E7@netconsonance.com>	<48472CCF.8080101@FreeBSD.org>	<4847EF62.1070709@rxsec.com>	<4847F814.10409@FreeBSD.org>	<4847FB1D.1050400@rxsec.com>	<d763ac660806050812o71329243lc7d58506490bd6b1@mail.gmail.com> <4848073C.2060509@rxsec.com> <484821EE.5070303@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 5, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> It's quite possible what was proposed is an awful idea and if it is
>> so be it. But it would appear as though it wasn't even considered.
>
> On the contrary. This, and lots of other ideas have been given very  
> careful consideration and have been rejected due to lack of  
> resources. There, feel better?
>
> Seriously folks, it's not as if we don't _want_ to be able to  
> provide better, longer, faster, $whatever support. We're just trying  
> to be realistic about what we can reasonably do with what we have  
> available.


Doug, would you possibly (without attacking me?) give some insight  
into the issues here?  This is what I was asking: what prevents  
supporting 6.2 ?  Where could I best apply some of my time to improve  
the situation?

-- 
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source  
and other randomness





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BBA9BC48-8ECB-4956-A7F5-70F81BB1E548>