From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jul 7 9:47:59 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dc-mx05.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx05.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB2C37B407 for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2001 09:47:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from duhring@charter.net) Received: from [24.217.157.157] (HELO dave) by dc-mx05.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with SMTP id 13714759; Sat, 07 Jul 2001 12:53:42 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Dave Uhring To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Oliver Fromme Subject: Re: JFS Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 11:47:55 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <200107071638.SAA19610@lurza.secnetix.de> In-Reply-To: <200107071638.SAA19610@lurza.secnetix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01070711475500.00362@dave> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Saturday 07 July 2001 11:38, Oliver Fromme wrote: > A. L. Meyers wrote: > > Just installed SuSE Linux 7.2 with Reiser FS throughout on an > > Intel SMP box. The FS purrs, even on /, which doesn't mean > > everything is better or worse than FBSD. > > > > As far as I know, ReiserFS is GPL. What would porting it to > > FreeBSD be better or worse than other (newer and less stable) > > alternatives? > > Maybe a dumb question, but ... > > In what way is ReiserFS so much better than UFS + Soft- > updates + background fsck, that it would justify the > efforts of porting ReiseFS to FreeBSD? > > Just wondering. > > Regards > Oliver http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-fs To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message