Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 14:13:54 -0600 (CST) From: Felipe Gasper <fgasper@uiuc.edu> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: kern/50574: dc driver incorrectly detects ADMtek chip model Message-ID: <200304032013.h33KDs7P041615@operaman.ods.org> Resent-Message-ID: <200304032020.h33KK4E0036384@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 50574 >Category: kern >Synopsis: dc driver incorrectly detects ADMtek chip model >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Thu Apr 03 12:20:03 PST 2003 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Felipe >Release: FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE i386 >Organization: >Environment: System: FreeBSD operaman.ods.org 4.8-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE #4: Tue Apr 1 22:05:17 CST 2003 fgasper@operaman.ods.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CUSTOM i386 >Description: I have a Linksys LNE-100TX v5.1 NIC. FBSD detects this card as using an ADMtek AN985, but OpenBSD detects it as an AN983. Checking ADMtek's site, the 985 is the mobile equivalent of the 983, from what I can tell; the Linksys device must then have a 983 and not a 985. >How-To-Repeat: Install a Linksys LNE-100TX v5.1 card (or prob. any card that uses an ADMtek 983) and dmesg. >Fix: I think it has to do w/ the 4-digit (?) ID string that the hardware reports; I looked into this once by comparing the OpenBSD code with the FreeBSD code. OBSD accomodates for a difference between the 983 and the 985. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: non-critical low sw-bug
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200304032013.h33KDs7P041615>