From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 19 09:40:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737E716A474; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 09:40:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFD343D49; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 09:40:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728422087; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:40:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: none X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 633FC2086; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:40:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3EC5B33C8D; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:40:40 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: "David Hoffman" References: <200606190054.k5J0sm0V014234@ns1.cityscope.net> Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:40:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: (David Hoffman's message of "Sun, 18 Jun 2006 21:05:37 -0400") Message-ID: <86bqspwkiv.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Ingrid Kast Fuller , Brett , freebsd-chat@freebsd.org, freebsd-user-groups@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serious breach of copyright -- First post X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 09:40:44 -0000 "David Hoffman" writes: > It'll certainly be less confusing that what HouFUG is publishing. They've > now noted on their site that it was written by you. However, they STILL > claim they own the copyright. No, they claim a copyright for their site, which is perfectly valid - look up "compilation copyright" in your favorite search engine. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no