From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 20 15:19:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AF437B401 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 15:19:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out005.verizon.net (out005pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B3DE43F3F for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 15:19:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com ([129.44.60.214]) by out005.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id <20030520221906.ZIFC25152.out005.verizon.net@mac.com>; Tue, 20 May 2003 17:19:06 -0500 Message-ID: <3ECAA9D9.1020602@mac.com> Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 18:19:05 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: abdul References: <003701c31ee8$ea1c1220$ea640180@abdul> In-Reply-To: <003701c31ee8$ea1c1220$ea640180@abdul> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.75.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out005.verizon.net from [129.44.60.214] at Tue, 20 May 2003 17:19:06 -0500 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dummynet/Traffic Shaping problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 22:19:08 -0000 abdul wrote: [ ... ] > ipfw pipe 10 config bw 64kbit/s queue 15kbytes > ipfw queue 10 config weight 60 pipe 10 > ipfw queue 10 ip from any to 193.114.79.76 > > I did not notice any change. > Is this configuration okay for my problem? Or can anyone help me with a > better one? You also need to configure a pipe and queue for the rest of the traffic with its own BW limitation of 64k. Something like: ipfw pipe 20 config bw 64k ipfw queue 20 config weight 10 pipe 20 ipfw queue 20 ip from any to any Or you could instead use one pipe of BW 128, and add the two queues at different weights, according to how much you want to favor one versus the other. -Chuck