Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 00:14:22 -0500 (EST) From: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> To: julian@whistle.com (Julian Elischer) Cc: dyson@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Still not fixed, but closer Message-ID: <199801120514.AAA00234@dyson.iquest.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980111205759.11658D-100000@current1.whistle.com> from Julian Elischer at "Jan 11, 98 08:59:30 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer said: > ok so vfs_subr.c 1.123 is still buggy? > it's hard to know what version you're talking about.. > > thanks by the way for doing all this work and taking it seriously enough > to be so concerned about keeping us posted. > vfs_subr.c 1.123 should be the first version that I think might be okay. Feedback regarding a kernel with this version of vfs_subr would be very much appreciated. -- John | Never try to teach a pig to sing, dyson@freebsd.org | it just makes you look stupid, jdyson@nc.com | and it irritates the pig.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199801120514.AAA00234>