From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Jan 11 16:33:16 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA24315
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 11 Jan 1998 16:33:16 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from mail.scsn.net (scsn.net [206.25.246.12])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA24277
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 11 Jan 1998 16:32:59 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from dmaddox@scsn.net)
Received: from rhiannon.scsn.net ([209.12.57.50]) by mail.scsn.net
          (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO205-101c)
          ID# 0-41950U6000L1100S0) with ESMTP id AAA140;
          Sun, 11 Jan 1998 19:31:24 -0500
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by rhiannon.scsn.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) id TAA00335;
	Sun, 11 Jan 1998 19:32:27 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from root)
Message-ID: <19980111193227.04735@scsn.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 19:32:27 -0500
From: Charlie Root <root@scsn.net>
To: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>
Cc: John Kelly <jak@cetlink.net>, dmaddox@scsn.net, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: 16650 Support(?)
Reply-To: dmaddox@scsn.net
References: <34b95e60.140553@mail.cetlink.net> <199801120007.TAA00316@dyson.iquest.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88
In-Reply-To: <199801120007.TAA00316@dyson.iquest.net>; from John S. Dyson on Sun, Jan 11, 1998 at 07:07:35PM -0500
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Jan 11, 1998 at 07:07:35PM -0500, John S. Dyson wrote:
> John Kelly said:
> > On Sun, 11 Jan 1998 15:06:19 -0500, dmaddox@scsn.net (Donald J.
> > Maddox) wrote:
> > 
> > >    I recently bought a 16C650-based LavaPort ISA card to support the
> > >230,400 bps capability of my ISDN modem.  It works fine under W95, but
> > >does _not_ work fine under FBSD-current.
> > 
> > The 650 support seems to be broken, so don't flag it as a 650.  Run it
> > as a 550 and it should work fine.  You still get the benefit of the
> > deeper FIFO, even when it's defined as a 550.  You don't get the auto
> > CTS/RTS flow control, but that has questionable value anyway.
> > 
> I have a 16650 based card, and it appears to work well.  It would be interesting
> to figure out why mine works, and others don't.

    What kind of card do you have?  I assume it's not a LavaPort...