Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 20:53:55 +0100 From: David Jenkins <david.jenkins@gmail.com> To: Toomas Aas <toomas.aas@raad.tartu.ee> Cc: "Lars H. Beuse" <bsd@dokfilm.org> Subject: Re: NameVirtualHost nat Message-ID: <9395922d04101212532d1019e9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200410121827.i9CIRJ3m010356@lv.raad.tartu.ee> References: <200410120127.42002.bsd@dokfilm.org> <200410121827.i9CIRJ3m010356@lv.raad.tartu.ee>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 21:26:55 +0300, Toomas Aas <toomas.aas@raad.tartu.ee> wrote: > Hi! > > "Lars H. Beuse" <bsd@dokfilm.org> wrote: > > > i want some apache NameVirtualHost behind a Paketfilter based on ipf, placed > > in two subnets. This router has two Cards one in the private net, one in the > > public. So far i just forward port 80 and 443 into my private net > > 192.168.2.0, but every request ends up on apaches rootlevel, NameVirtualHost > > directive is useless. So, how to forward http(s):// requests through the > > Paketfilter matching the right VirtualHost? Maybe i've thought in a wrong > > direction, so far. Just some little hints should be enough. > > I can't be 100% sure because I haven't done this kind of thing myself, > but I don't see why port forwarding should interfere with Apache's > name-based virtual hosting. After all, they operate on different layers > of the OSI model: port forwarding is purely TCP business while > VirtualHosts are HTTP. Indeed. This sounds like something isn't wuite right with the Apache setup. Lars, have you tried accessing the webserver from your private network, localhost, with/without the firewall enabled. Does that make any difference or do you get the same result each time? You could also try setting "LogLevel debug" in httpd.conf and see what errors (if any) you are getting. It's probably best though if you post the VirtualHost section of your httpd.conf. Hope this helps. David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9395922d04101212532d1019e9>