Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 12:14:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@hub.freebsd.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@ucb.crimea.ua> Cc: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NetWare client in -current Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909101213500.76113-100000@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <19990910122431.B99718@relay.ucb.crimea.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > Is there any reason to not have it as a port? > > > IMHO, only the basic IPX/SPX functionality should be included into the > source tree. Anything else could be available as ports/net/nw-utils. I tend to agree. If we bring in all of this stuff (even though I appreciate it's very useful) we should also bring in samba into the base tree by symmetry. Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9909101213500.76113-100000>