From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 1 11:38:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F048B37B405 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 11:38:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay.pair.com (relay.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86BD843FBD for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 11:38:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: (qmail 38053 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2003 19:38:08 -0000 Received: from niwun.pair.com (HELO localhost) (209.68.2.70) by relay.pair.com with SMTP; 1 Apr 2003 19:38:08 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70 Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 13:34:40 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack To: Pete Fritchman In-Reply-To: <20030401190553.GB21045@absolutbsd.org> Message-ID: <20030401133241.I564@odysseus.silby.com> References: <200304010821.h318Li4Q091687@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030401190553.GB21045@absolutbsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: "Matthew N. Dodd" Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/ping ping.8 ping.csrc/share/man/man4inet.4 ip.4 src/sys/netinet in.h in_pcb.h ip.h ip_input.c ip_output.c ip_var.h src/usr.bin/netstat inet.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 19:38:12 -0000 I bet you wouldn't be laughing if I had committed code which locked out any account named petef as an April Fools joke. Joke commit messages are funny. Committing crap to the repository as a joke is not funny. Mike "Silby" Silbersack On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Pete Fritchman wrote: > ++ 01/04/03 11:43 -0600 - Mike Silbersack: > | Actually committing to the tree is taking this joke quite a bit too far. > | Is repo-surgery planned to remove this? > > Please don't back this out, I'll take this to the TRB if necessary. At > work, we've already made the appropriate firewall policy changes, and so > far, management is quite impressed. > > Also, if I may make a suggestion, the Evil bit should be set to 0x1 by > default - it's the same logic as making a firewall deny everything and > just allow the traffic you want. We should explicitly have to say we > are _not evil_ when we send packets. > > --pete >