From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 10 01:08:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CAF9149 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:08:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288DA1233 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:08:31 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=E430+8tl c=1 sm=0 tr=0 a=nVny9ETX7T5uMhI2oTVyRA==:117 a=P5ol5vWo9mUA:10 a=AaUjGI9IrlcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=OA2lqS22AAAA:8 a=sIt-5M63AAAA:8 a=7HSFb-w2Wy8A:10 a=cY-c9lZLBuw74WQFAdEA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=roberthuff@rcn.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=roberthuff@rcn.com; sender-id=neutral Received-SPF: neutral (smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 209.6.193.164 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of rcn.com) Received: from [209.6.193.164] ([209.6.193.164:45911] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTP id 1D/2C-23718-80725B15; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 21:08:24 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20917.9991.514334.851719@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 21:08:23 -0400 To: Walter Hurry Subject: Re: buildworld selectively? In-Reply-To: References: <51B4CFCA.3010705@hayers.org> <44mwqzotyf.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 22) "Instant Classic" XEmacs Lucid Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:08:33 -0000 Walter Hurry writes: > Fair enough. Point taken, thanks. Nevertheless I see no reason to > compile stuff I neither want nor need. While I endorse the principle ... it can be difficult for the casual user to know which parts can be removed without blowing up things they want. (Been there, had to change the underwear after the new kernel didn't boot. Booted old kernel, fixed things.) Robert Huff