Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 5 Aug 2011 21:20:08 -0600
From:      Dmitri Brengauz <dmitri@momus.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Alternative windowmanagers
Message-ID:  <CAGu_qiPssFewdGFMeodZXELQDGTf9UfhcZG1=HEv+3KZgna+EQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110806015652.GB45455@guilt.hydra>
References:  <20110805191214.GA19848@kar.user-mode.org> <20110805190825.d2cf7f06.rodperson@rodperson.com> <20110806015652.GB45455@guilt.hydra>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 07:08:25PM -0400, Rod Person wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 21:12:14 +0200
> > Christian Barthel <bc@nyx.user-mode.org> wrote:
> > > I sniffed into AfterStep, fvwm2 and fluxbox (I don't want to use KDE).
> I
> > > think, fluxbox is a nice wm and for my future, it will be the default
> wm
> > > for me. It's also very fast and easy to configure.
> > >
> > > Are there any other window manager worth looking?
> > >
> > > What is your window manager?
> >
> > If you like Fluxbox you might want to try OpenBox.
>
> Nah.  Stick with Fluxbox.
>
>
Sorry, but why?  I went with OpenBox, because it seemed like it was under
current development, and Fluxbox is stagnant, otherwise, I didn't see much
difference.  But I do find it curious that so many on this thread are
recommending Fluxbox, and almost no one OpenBox.  What would be the reason?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGu_qiPssFewdGFMeodZXELQDGTf9UfhcZG1=HEv+3KZgna+EQ>