Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 20:15:26 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Jan Mikkelsen <janm@transactionware.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WAN cards: Sangoma vs. Tahoe group Message-ID: <42F57CCE.2060804@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <002c01c59ae9$6f3c7de0$0204a8c0@transactionware.com> References: <002c01c59ae9$6f3c7de0$0204a8c0@transactionware.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jan Mikkelsen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking using either Sangoma cards or the Tahoe Group cards for > connections to a frame relay network (Telstra in Australia, for what it's > worth). > > I'm comparing the Sangoma A101-U to the Tahoe 971 and the Sangoma S5141 to > the Tahoe 931. > >>From looking at the archives, people seem generally happy with Sangoma, but > I can't find much on the Tahoe cards and FreeBSD. The software for the > Tahoe cards is significantly simpler than the Sangoma Wanpipe stuff. > > What are the general experiences of these cards? Is anyone actually using > the Tahoe cards? If you can get a dumb sync card that runs with the sr or ar drivers then FreeBSD has built in frame relay code. > > Thanks, > > Jan Mikkelsen > janm@transactionware.com > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42F57CCE.2060804>