From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat May  3 17:37:30 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 143031DB
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 May 2014 17:37:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC70A11E9
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 May 2014 17:37:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <lists@opsec.eu>)
 id 1WgdsO-0007dB-8e; Sat, 03 May 2014 19:37:28 +0200
Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 19:37:28 +0200
From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To: "Dr. Peter Voigt" <pvoigt@uos.de>
Subject: Re: Thunderbird 24.5.0 - Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Message-ID: <20140503173728.GW2341@home.opsec.eu>
References: <20140502004330.220f006d@tiger2008.drpetervoigt.private>
 <CABG_4j=4YPygLLdrwrMo69V4djDktc8t6BezOA9ReFuZpVBryg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140503011525.203a9828@tiger2008.drpetervoigt.private>
 <CABG_4j=1UPer-cHqB+Ysn39Kc-YsDwrR5H=RqEEYNgdROZa2zg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140503134250.2d13ebe3@tiger2008.drpetervoigt.private>
 <20140503122435.GV2341@home.opsec.eu>
 <20140503151533.24dabd1a@tiger2008.drpetervoigt.private>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140503151533.24dabd1a@tiger2008.drpetervoigt.private>
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 May 2014 17:37:30 -0000

Hi!

> > So, the difference is mostly SASL.

> Thanks for your testing. And my feeling strongly suggests that
> SASL will be the reason of the segmentation fault.

It might be the cause, yes. But not guilty until proven 8-}

> I have detected some
> OpenLDAP SASL related errors on 10.0-RELEASE in the past:
> 
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2014-February/089516.html
> https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=44576
> 
> That error affected portmaster and is solved.
> 
> It might be helful to add an SASL hint and a reference to this thread
> to PR188019 (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=188019). This
> could help the port maintainers. But I am afraid that I cannot add
> comments on an open PR. What do you recommend on how to proceed?

You should be able if you just group-reply to the initial mail you received
from gnats.

I've added the hint about it working if openldap is built without SASL
to the PR.

I'll have a look at the backtrace.

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         6 years to go !