Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 21 Apr 1995 18:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com>
To:        terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert)
Cc:        jkh@freefall.cdrom.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Minutes of the Thursday, April 13th core team meeting in Berkeley.
Message-ID:  <199504220106.SAA20941@ref.tfs.com>
In-Reply-To: <9504220036.AA06063@cs.weber.edu> from "Terry Lambert" at Apr 21, 95 06:36:36 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > With respect, S^3 is something that students fall prey to.  You
> > > might argue that companies do so as well; I susbmit that these
> > > are not successful companies.
> 
> [ ... I've seen S^3 at it's evil worst ... ]
> 
> I cheated.  By definition, a company that has fallen victim to S^3
> will not be successful.  If it is, then it hasn't been a victim.

We're clearly inside the 20% zone where Terry is completely and utterly
off the mark.

IBM "not successful" ????

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent'
=> 'no rude people are relevant'



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504220106.SAA20941>