From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Apr 21 18:07:03 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id SAA27250 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 21 Apr 1995 18:07:03 -0700 Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA27241 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 1995 18:07:02 -0700 Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id SAA20941; Fri, 21 Apr 1995 18:06:59 -0700 From: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-Id: <199504220106.SAA20941@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: Minutes of the Thursday, April 13th core team meeting in Berkeley. To: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 1995 18:06:58 -0700 (PDT) Cc: jkh@freefall.cdrom.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <9504220036.AA06063@cs.weber.edu> from "Terry Lambert" at Apr 21, 95 06:36:36 pm Content-Type: text Content-Length: 659 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > With respect, S^3 is something that students fall prey to. You > > > might argue that companies do so as well; I susbmit that these > > > are not successful companies. > > [ ... I've seen S^3 at it's evil worst ... ] > > I cheated. By definition, a company that has fallen victim to S^3 > will not be successful. If it is, then it hasn't been a victim. We're clearly inside the 20% zone where Terry is completely and utterly off the mark. IBM "not successful" ???? -- Poul-Henning Kamp -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc. 'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent' => 'no rude people are relevant'