From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Oct 28 18:48:23 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98E9B38
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:48:23 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C618FC16
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:48:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from eagle.yuri.org (stunnel@localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (authenticated bits=0)
 by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9SImJrk038350;
 Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:48:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
Message-ID: <508D7DF3.8080103@rawbw.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:48:19 -0700
From: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:16.0) Gecko/20121023 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Patrick Lamaiziere <patfbsd@davenulle.org>
Subject: Re: Why RELENG_9 branch is labeled as PRERELEASE and freebsd.org
 says FreeBSD is currently at 9.1-RC2 ?
References: <508C7445.6080809@rawbw.com>
 <20121028151758.5f866bcb@davenulle.org>
In-Reply-To: <20121028151758.5f866bcb@davenulle.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:48:24 -0000

On 10/28/2012 07:17, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> RELENG_9 should be called 9-STABLE, if you want 9.1 use RELENG_9_1

Hm, if they wanted to keep RELENG_9 as "stable" 9.X branch, why then 
9.1-PRERELEASE is there? Is PRERELEASE considered more stable than RC? 
This looks strange to me.

Yuri