From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 04:24:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6281816A4CF for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 04:24:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from outpost.globcon.net (outpost.globcon.net [62.141.88.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B31C443D3F for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 04:24:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sergei@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 80682 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2003 12:24:02 -0000 Received: from agdcgw01.akingump.com (HELO kolobov.com) (12.40.174.2) by outpost.globcon.net (62.141.88.161) with SMTP; 18 Dec 2003 12:24:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 12210 invoked by uid 911); 18 Dec 2003 12:22:58 -0000 Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:22:58 +0300 From: Sergei Kolobov To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20031218122258.GJ719@chetwood.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Doug Barton , ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Jan-Peter Koopmann References: <20031217060754.GA714@chetwood.ru> <3FE10F42.7030208@dougbarton.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FUFe+yI/t+r3nyH4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FE10F42.7030208@dougbarton.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Jan-Peter Koopmann cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports MOVED X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:24:12 -0000 --FUFe+yI/t+r3nyH4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2003-12-17 at 18:21 -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > Sergei Kolobov wrote: >=20 > >I have mixed feelings about this myself, however: > >- the software refers to itself as "MailScanner", in Perl module name, > > all paths and filenames >=20 > We have some other perl stuff that defies the case sensitive convention,= =20 > but I don't like that either. :) Also, is this thing a perl module?=20 To avoid further confusion: Sorry, I mis-used the term "Perl module". What I meant was: there is a component of this package that is named MailScanner.pm It is not a Perl module in a sense that is installed into ${SITE_PERL} hierarchy and just contains functions to be called by other Perl scripts. It is the heart of this package. > If so, then there should be a p5- prepended to the port name.=20 > THAT convention is well enough engrained to be outside dispute. I absolutely agree, except it doesn't apply here. ;) > >- I suggested to the maintainer that PORTNAME should be changed to > > MailScanner, in order to make the paths and names consistent with the > > software's own naming scheme >=20 > I think that your advice here was bad. All due respect. The value of=20 > having a consistent name space in the ports tree far exceeds the value=20 > of consistency with the path names of the installed software. Yes, I guess it was a mistake. Give me that pointy hat, please... Sergei --FUFe+yI/t+r3nyH4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/4ZwiFOxuaTulNAERAruLAJ9asaFOAll1PJcGdaZV2QMDQ9QVBACdG6no uIgBRmyqFr5X0qQSKuqvg28= =Pxlf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FUFe+yI/t+r3nyH4--