Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Jul 2002 03:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Ross Lippert <ripper@eskimo.com>
To:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: stable-digest V5 #601
Message-ID:  <200207261043.DAA08192@eskimo.com>
In-Reply-To: <bulk.21115.20020725170403@hub.freebsd.org> (owner-freebsd-stable-digest@FreeBSD.ORG)

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>wrapper could potentially open a security hole.  When you install
>X from ports, you get a big flashy notice telling you about the
>wrapper, and that should be good enough.

Actually, I've always installed X from sysinstall and I didn't know
anything about X-Wrapper either.  I don't see why a short menu of
"xdm\ngdm\nxwrapper\n(none)" can't be displayed to the user that
picks an X-base-distribution.

Dependencies are tricky I guess because it is a dependency really on
"one of" a set of things.

-r


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200207261043.DAA08192>