From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 3 23:45:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F442F2A for ; Sat, 3 May 2014 23:45:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-auth.serv.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (vm136.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de [131.173.16.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D914D1445 for ; Sat, 3 May 2014 23:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hal9000.drpetervoigt.private (p5DC4C3B8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.196.195.184]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-auth.serv.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s43Nj1RF007303 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 4 May 2014 01:45:02 +0200 Received: from tiger2008.drpetervoigt.private (tiger2008.drpetervoigt.private [192.168.1.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pvoigt) by hal9000.drpetervoigt.private (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D50681E0042; Sun, 4 May 2014 01:32:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 4 May 2014 01:32:56 +0200 From: "Dr. Peter Voigt" To: Kurt Jaeger Subject: Re: Thunderbird 24.5.0 - Segmentation fault (core dumped) Message-ID: <20140504013256.6be32a9b@tiger2008.drpetervoigt.private> In-Reply-To: <20140503173728.GW2341@home.opsec.eu> References: <20140502004330.220f006d@tiger2008.drpetervoigt.private> <20140503011525.203a9828@tiger2008.drpetervoigt.private> <20140503134250.2d13ebe3@tiger2008.drpetervoigt.private> <20140503122435.GV2341@home.opsec.eu> <20140503151533.24dabd1a@tiger2008.drpetervoigt.private> <20140503173728.GW2341@home.opsec.eu> Organization: =?UTF-8?B?VW5pdmVyc2l0w6R0IE9zbmFicsO8Y2s=?= X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.22.1; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2014.5.3.231819 (Univ. Osnabrueck) X-PMX-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report= EU_TLD 0.1, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1200_1299 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, FROM_NAME_PHRASE 0, RDNS_POOLED 0, RDNS_SUSP 0, RDNS_SUSP_SPECIFIC 0, URI_ENDS_IN_HTML 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_REPLYTO 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __RDNS_POOLED_10 0, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM 0, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_ACC 0, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_ADDY 0, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_DOMAIN 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __URI_NS X-PMX-Spam-Level: IIIIIIII Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Dr. Peter Voigt" List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 May 2014 23:45:08 -0000 Am Sat, 3 May 2014 19:37:28 +0200 schrieb Kurt Jaeger : > Hi! > > > > So, the difference is mostly SASL. > > > Thanks for your testing. And my feeling strongly suggests that > > SASL will be the reason of the segmentation fault. > > It might be the cause, yes. But not guilty until proven 8-} > > > I have detected some > > OpenLDAP SASL related errors on 10.0-RELEASE in the past: > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2014-February/089516.html > > https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=44576 > > > > That error affected portmaster and is solved. > > > > It might be helful to add an SASL hint and a reference to this > > thread to PR188019 > > (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=188019). This could > > help the port maintainers. But I am afraid that I cannot add > > comments on an open PR. What do you recommend on how to proceed? > > You should be able if you just group-reply to the initial mail you > received from gnats. > > I've added the hint about it working if openldap is built without SASL > to the PR. > > I'll have a look at the backtrace. > Thank you very much for complementing PR188019 - and informing me how to generally add further comments to a PR. Regards, Peter