Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:37:45 +0200 From: Andreas Longwitz <longwitz@incore.de> To: pyunyh@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel 82550 Pro/100 Ethernet and Microcode Message-ID: <4F707F39.9080204@incore.de> In-Reply-To: <20120326003016.GA1435@michelle.cdnetworks.com> References: <4F594856.3030303@incore.de> <20120312211907.GC3671@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <4F5E0AF7.30302@incore.de> <20120313202559.GA3360@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <4F66646E.4080603@incore.de> <20120320041647.GE7518@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <4F6DA161.9040408@incore.de> <20120326003016.GA1435@michelle.cdnetworks.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > > I've attached a patch which will show both compatibility and EEPROM > ID word and allowed loading microcode for 82550 family. Let me > know whether this patch works for you. Yes, the patch workes fine and I have for my LOM's (rev 0x0d): fxp0: <Intel 82550C Pro/100 Ethernet> port .... fxp0: Compatibility word : 0X0d13 fxp0: EEPROM ID word : 0X5060 and for two external cards (rev 0x0c) I see fxp1: <Intel 82550 Pro/100 Ethernet> port ... fxp1: Compatibility word : 0X040b fxp1: EEPROM ID word : 0X58a0 fxp2: <Intel 82550 Pro/100 Ethernet> port ... fxp2: Compatibility word : 0X020b fxp2: EEPROM ID word : 0X50a0 > I vaguely guess there are > differences between LOM and non-LOM implementation(Mine is > stand-alone PCI NIC). I would be able to selectively allow > microcode loading after getting compatibility/EEPROM ID word. Thank you for investigating in this problem. Regards Andreas Longwitz
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F707F39.9080204>