Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:04:35 +0000 (GMT) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>, <cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha swtch.s Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0102221602230.32872-100000@herring.nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010222075403.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 22-Feb-01 Doug Rabson wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, John Baldwin wrote: > > > >> jhb 2001/02/22 07:06:20 PST > >> > >> Modified files: > >> sys/alpha/alpha swtch.s > >> Log: > >> Cleanup and clarify the comments above switch_trampoline(). > > > > Should we unify the name for this thing? Alpha and ia64 use > > switch_trampoline (derived from the NetBSD/alpha code) and i386 uses > > fork_trampoline, which is probably a slightly better name. > > I've thought about doing that, yes. If you want, I can stick it on my todo > list. Also, I have managed to make userret() and ast() (modulo a few commits > coming up in the next 15 minutes or so) the same across all architectures. > Do you think that given that it would be feasible to move those two functions > to sys/kern/subr_trap.c and let them be MI? That seems like a good direction to take. > > Also, as a sidenote, I think that addupc_task() should take a uniptr_t, not a > uint64_t as its second argument.. It should certainly be uintptr_t. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Phone: +44 20 8348 6160 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.33.0102221602230.32872-100000>