From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org  Thu Dec 14 02:02:56 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2582EE8F36D
 for <freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu, 14 Dec 2017 02:02:56 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from karels@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail.karels.net (mail.karels.net [216.160.39.52])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C9D6D57D;
 Thu, 14 Dec 2017 02:02:55 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from karels@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail.karels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.karels.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id vBE22stW041959;
 Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:02:54 -0600 (CST)
 (envelope-from karels@FreeBSD.org)
Message-Id: <201712140202.vBE22stW041959@mail.karels.net>
To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
cc: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org>,
 "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
From: Mike Karels <karels@FreeBSD.org>
Reply-to: karels@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Sendmail deprecation ?
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 13 Dec 2017 19:47:21 -0600.
 <20171214014721.GC7123@lonesome.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <41957.1513216974.1@mail.karels.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:02:54 -0600
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 02:02:56 -0000

> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 05:45:57PM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
> > Not really silly.

> It's silly to be in the default install on an arm board IMHO.

> mcl

Presumably dealing with this issue is one of the goals of turning base
into packages, and hopefully there can be different defaults for
different architectures or profiles.  Removing just sendmail won't get
you much space back (especially if you just remove /usr/sbin/sendmail,
which is just a symlink to mailwrapper).  A small arm board is more
likely to be single-purpose, but it's hard to guess what that purpose
might be.  I certainly wouldn't rule out the possibility of such a board
originating mail, though.

		Mike