Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 27 Jan 2019 21:53:42 -0500
From:      Paul Kraus <paul@kraus-haus.org>
To:        freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: The status of docker
Message-ID:  <7A86028D-C413-4063-84D8-5AB985EAD2A0@kraus-haus.org>
In-Reply-To: <FDDC8A58-8AD3-4D07-B0B3-0BDFA214ABA0@punkt.de>
References:  <089e330d-2761-2440-3b7f-dd22e9088af5@gjunka.com> <9A01020A-7CC6-4893-A425-11A7BF736F4E@ultra-secure.de> <42f59b63-fdc7-306f-d836-83533741a86c@FreeBSD.org> <CAG=rPVfTZnYc6%2BDjtk0SjkqijJQh6uA1G9VWEBsYy4aDYvYEgQ@mail.gmail.com> <CC0F6FB5-7939-4586-86DD-B5548E0043C3@punkt.de> <5c926314-adce-dba1-f5ce-2fda35e1aeba@gjunka.com> <FDDC8A58-8AD3-4D07-B0B3-0BDFA214ABA0@punkt.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 22, 2019, at 3:01 PM, Patrick M. Hausen <hausen@punkt.de> wrote:
>=20
> Hi all,
>=20
>> Am 22.01.2019 um 20:48 schrieb Grzegorz Junka <list1@gjunka.com>:
>> 2. A docker container in a jail with no native linux kernel, docker =
is running completely in FreeBSD environment
>>=20
>> 2 would be most convenient but also most difficult as all smallest =
docker features would need to be ported natively to FreeBSD
>=20
>=20
> IIRC the Joyent approach was to port the Linux system call API to an
> extent that made it possible to =E2=80=9Esimply=E2=80=9C run Linux =
Docker in zones without
> a Linux kernel =E2=80=A6

(Open)Solaris already had Linux Brand zones, which I=E2=80=99m sure =
helped get there much faster. They could already run Linux (user space) =
in a Zone.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7A86028D-C413-4063-84D8-5AB985EAD2A0>