From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 25 22:13:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C8EF16A41C for ; Wed, 25 May 2005 22:13:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd.nospam@mekanix.dk) Received: from mail.aaq.bolignet.dk (cpe.atm2-0-1021060.0x50a5f3f2.boanxx12.customer.tele.dk [80.165.243.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF22943D1D for ; Wed, 25 May 2005 22:13:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd.nospam@mekanix.dk) Received: from desktop.home (unknown [10.10.3.10]) by mail.aaq.bolignet.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1DE205F9F; Wed, 25 May 2005 23:52:22 +0200 (CEST) From: Bjarne Wichmann Petersen To: Kris Kennaway Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 00:14:35 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <3248.172.16.0.199.1116876092.squirrel@172.16.0.1> <200505252342.01938.freebsd.nospam@mekanix.dk> <20050525214555.GA41695@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050525214555.GA41695@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200505260014.37054.freebsd.nospam@mekanix.dk> Cc: Matthias Buelow , Mike Jakubik , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 22:13:59 -0000 On Wednesday 25 May 2005 23:45, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 11:42:01PM +0200, Bjarne Wichmann Petersen wrote: > > I've had PREEMTION enabled in 5-STABLE for at couple of month and had the > > opposite experience. Eg. when clicking on a file in a fileselector (I'm > > using KDE) it would take 2-3 seconds before the file got highlighted. > > After disabling PREEMTION again responsetime seems to have improved. > Are you running 5.4-RELEASE or later? Later (5.4-STABLE). Hmm... did a little testing. Sometimes I *still* get "long" responsetimes with PREEMPTION disabled in a seemingly random order. Bjarne