Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 11:12:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik <dirkx@webweaving.org> To: Grant Peel <grant@thenetnow.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IP alias Networking Errors. Message-ID: <20030525111102.H75414-100000@foem> In-Reply-To: <031201c3225f$8f24ffb0$6401a8c0@grant>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 24 May 2003, Grant Peel wrote: > fxp0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 65.39.193.154 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 65.39.193.159 > inet 65.39.193.155 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.39.193.155 > inet 65.39.193.156 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.39.193.156 > inet 65.39.193.157 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.39.193.157 > inet 216.187.107.125 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 216.187.107.125 > inet 216.187.107.126 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 216.187.107.126 > inet 216.187.107.123 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 216.187.107.123 > inet 216.187.107.124 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 216.187.107.124 Over here I have the same issue at my colo. The man page suggest a /32 netmask for all -but- the first on that subnet.SO I am using > inet 65.39.193.154 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 65.39.193.159 > inet 65.39.193.155 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.39.193.155 > inet 65.39.193.156 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.39.193.156 > inet 65.39.193.157 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.39.193.157 >> inet 216.187.107.125 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 216.187.107.125 > inet 216.187.107.126 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 216.187.107.126 > inet 216.187.107.123 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 216.187.107.123 > inet 216.187.107.124 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 216.187.107.124 Which got rid of my warnings. Dw.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030525111102.H75414-100000>