From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Tue Mar 29 08:00:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C23AE1A78; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 08:00:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B8210A3; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 08:00:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id A5F6F1C72; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 08:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 08:00:01 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: marino@freebsd.org Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r412019 - head/games/tbe Message-ID: <20160329080001.GA81193@FreeBSD.org> References: <201603272245.u2RMjdZS009225@repo.freebsd.org> <20160329073339.GA72433@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 08:00:01 -0000 On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 09:42:23AM +0200, John Marino (FreeBSD) wrote: > On 3/29/2016 9:33 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 10:45:39PM +0000, John Marino wrote: > >> New Revision: 412019 > >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/412019 > >> > >> Log: > >> games/tbe: Fix plist (main executable wasn't listed) > >> [...] > >> > >> Added: > >> head/games/tbe/pkg-plist (contents, props changed) > > > > I guess pkg-plist should've been repocopied (resurrected) in this case. > > I disagree. > 1) It's been gone a long time and many versions have changed since. > Showing changes from back then to now has no value. I thought that perhaps the won't be too many differences between that old version amd current. > 2) Repocopy makes sense to me ONCE, when creating a new port. After the > port is created, don't use it within a port. I don't see people doing > this and I'm glad about that. If we said it's okay returning pkg-plist, > then you can claim it's okay for returning patch files, which is absurd. That seems arguable; I would consider repocopying even patches if changes warrant it, and would certainly repocopy any pkg-* files. It really helps to keep the dots connected and makes archaeology much easier. Once you get into the habit of studying the history before making any changes on a port this becomes quite conspicuous. ./danfe