Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:17:40 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> To: Alex Keda <admin@lissyara.su> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: HAL source code vs binary code Message-ID: <20081011161740.GA77291@owl.midgard.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <48F0CEA3.4080601@lissyara.su> References: <48F0CEA3.4080601@lissyara.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 08:04:51PM +0400, Alex Keda wrote: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/26/321 > whether there are plans to include source code HAL in FreeBSD? > It is very difficult to update 2 MB binary files .. Be aware that the binary HAL included in FreeBSD (and also used by the Linux Madwifi driver) is not identical to the HAL Atheros just released the source code for. (see http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/26/344 ) I am quite sure it would be possible to change the ath driver in FreeBSD to use this open HAL instead, but it would almost certainly require a non-trivial amount of work, and you might lose whatever enhancements and bug-fixes is available in the binary HAL compared to the released one. -- <Insert your favourite quote here.> Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081011161740.GA77291>