Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 12 May 2005 18:27:15 +0100
From:      Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com>
To:        Steven Jurczyk <steve@post.pl>
Cc:        Marian Hettwer <MH@kernel32.de>
Subject:   Re: SCHED_ULE with SMP broke libpthread/libthr on 5.4-RELEASE
Message-ID:  <3aaaa3a05051210277bf6ab2@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4282E139.7030908@post.pl>
References:  <4281FBC9.5040506@post.pl> <4096.212.12.51.89.1115816916.squirrel@212.12.51.89> <3aaaa3a050511162864263c74@mail.gmail.com> <4282E139.7030908@post.pl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ok thanks I will stick to the old scheduler on my smp system then.

Chris

On 5/12/05, Steven Jurczyk <steve@post.pl> wrote:
> Chris wrote:
>=20
> >Seems the 4+ cpu crash fix might have broken it at a guess since RC4
> >onwards it broke, I am interested in how this goes as I was planning
> >on upgrading a SMP box to 5.4 and ULE this month.
> >
> >Have you guys tried this without SMP?
> >
> >
> Yes.
> pthreads applications under SCHED_ULE but without SMP works OK...
>=20
> PS. Please remeber that SCHED_ULE with SMP brokes also >10 utils
> compiled with pthreads in base system (host, dig, nslookup -> all DNS
> stuff).
> --
> best regards
> steve at home.pl
>=20
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3aaaa3a05051210277bf6ab2>