From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 3 12:20:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BFC1106568A for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:20:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163118FC25 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:20:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m23CK4Tc032185 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:20:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m23CK4wd032184; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:20:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:20:04 GMT Message-Id: <200803031220.m23CK4wd032184@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Volker Cc: Subject: Re: bin/57673: Odd/dangerous disklabel(8) behaviour on 5.0 and 5.1-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Volker List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:20:05 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/57673; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Volker To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, guy.van.sanden@pandora.be Cc: Subject: Re: bin/57673: Odd/dangerous disklabel(8) behaviour on 5.0 and 5.1-CURRENT Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 13:19:05 +0100 Guy, disklabel has seen some fixes in the 5.x era and has finally been replaced by bsdlabel (also back in the 5.x times IIRC). I'm pretty sure I haven't seen this misbehavior for a while now. Do you agree to close this PR? On a side note to the sample you've given: the label editor should be used on a slice or a disk but not on a label.