From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 12:07:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A691B16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:07:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (cpe.atm2-0-53484.0x50a6c9a6.abnxx9.customer.tele.dk [80.166.201.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C9B643D6E for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:06:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sos@spider.deepcore.dk) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0DK6amK009418; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:06:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sos@spider.deepcore.dk) Received: (from sos@localhost) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0DK6aqI009417; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:06:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sos) Message-Id: <200401132006.i0DK6aqI009417@spider.deepcore.dk> In-Reply-To: <40044E2B.3080703@compgeek.com> To: noackjr@compgeek.com Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:06:35 +0100 (CET) Sender: sos@spider.deepcore.dk From: sos@deepcore.dk X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99f (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-mail-scanned: by DeepCore Virus & Spam killer v1.3 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:14:41 -0800 cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 5.2-RELEASE: unable to mount cd-roms X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:07:08 -0000 It seems Jon Noack wrote: > In the "5.2-CURRENT panic on startup after cvsup: probably recent ATA" > thread, Søren said: > " one ATAPI device as master? This will break lots-a-stuff if > so... " That was in a very different context where one master device responded to both master and slave selection... > My DVD-ROM is the master of ata0. Is this out of spec? It worked fine > with 4.x in this same configuration. No, thats just fine. From the above it looks like you arent getting interrupts... -Søren Yes I know it works under windows!!