From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Apr 25 01:12:09 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA01470
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 01:12:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA01464
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 01:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id BAA01833; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 01:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
To: Jim Shankland <jas@flyingfox.com>
cc: dg@root.com, pst@jnx.com, cmsedore@mailbox.syr.edu, dennis@etinc.com,
        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Router statistics 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 24 Apr 1997 22:19:21 PDT."
             <199704250519.WAA17037@biggusdiskus.flyingfox.com> 
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 1997 01:11:45 -0700
Message-ID: <1831.861955905@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I really need high throughput and efficiency.  And the card *is*
> cheaper.  Does there have to be a switch to the fxp driver in
> my future?

Given the close role of the person (dg) who supports this driver in
the FreeBSD project, and given all of the Intel card's various
performance and cost advantages (not to mention it being the only
driver to support full-duplex operation), I think this decision is
kind of a no-brainer, myself. :-)

					Jordan