From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 22 18:49:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6091316A4DB; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 18:49:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.BAYAREA.NET [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAAB343D5D; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 18:49:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j3MInMUk041487; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 11:49:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@ns1.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j3MInMPO041486; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 11:49:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 11:49:22 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Ruslan Ermilov Message-ID: <20050422184922.GA41457@ns1.xcllnt.net> References: <200504221742.j3MHgoG9084110@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050422.114615.71130404.imp@bsdimp.com> <20050422175324.GA32739@ip.net.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050422175324.GA32739@ip.net.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Warner Losh Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/config main.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 18:49:48 -0000 On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 08:53:24PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 11:46:15AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > > Ask that "make cleandepend" be run before "make depend", now that > > > we don't do this automatically. > > > > > > Suggested by: bde > > > > I think this is a regression in the building of the kernel that's not > > desirable. We should fix make depend to just cope with files that > > have gone away, which is all that's needed here. > > > The day this gets fixed this message can go away. Up until now, > you have kept your ideas how to do this in secret (despite me > asking you). ;) What exactly is broken? I don't see a breakage, even when source files disappeared. I assume I must be forgetting something or not doing everything right. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net