Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:09:40 +0200
From:      "John Marino (FreeBSD)" <freebsd.contact@marino.st>
To:        Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>
Cc:        marino@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, owner-ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r412019 - head/games/tbe
Message-ID:  <4eeeec4223ac25967c34601fe6f170c7@secure.marino.st>
In-Reply-To: <20160329080001.GA81193@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201603272245.u2RMjdZS009225@repo.freebsd.org> <20160329073339.GA72433@FreeBSD.org> <e5e99f807d75f25f74da3e4ce0e75613@secure.marino.st> <20160329080001.GA81193@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2016-03-29 10:00, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>> 2) Repocopy makes sense to me ONCE, when creating a new port.  After 
>> the
>> port is created, don't use it within a port.  I don't see people doing
>> this and I'm glad about that.  If we said it's okay returning 
>> pkg-plist,
>> then you can claim it's okay for returning patch files, which is 
>> absurd.
> 
> That seems arguable; I would consider repocopying even patches if 
> changes
> warrant it, and would certainly repocopy any pkg-* files.  It really 
> helps
> to keep the dots connected and makes archaeology much easier.  Once you
> get into the habit of studying the history before making any changes on 
> a
> port this becomes quite conspicuous.

Recopy is not free.  There is a price of effort to do this.  It slows 
maintenance down.  If somebody is truly doing geneology on a particular 
port, svn holds enough information.  Suggesting to repocopy individual 
files in a port is too much for benefit of 0.00001% of the time somebody 
will find such effort useful.

Let's not put up even more barriers to maintenance.  "Keeping dots 
connected" doesn't demonstrate a real benefit to me.  Surely svn has 
some kind of "diff between revs" feature that could be used by anyone 
that cares (which I assume is truly nobody once the academic arguments 
are put aside).

John



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4eeeec4223ac25967c34601fe6f170c7>