Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 23:30:47 +1000 From: Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> To: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>, Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Needs triage .. Message-ID: <540B0C87.9070005@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20140906230043.H58647@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20140906221516.Q58647@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20140906125502.GA1892@elch.exwg.net> <20140906230043.H58647@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/09/2014 11:23 PM, Ian Smith wrote: > On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 14:55:03 +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > > ## Ian Smith (smithi@nimnet.asn.au): > > > > > Are these just getting auto-assigned to stable@? Can anyone play? :) > > > > The submitter explicitly adds stable@ to the bug's Cc list. > > Yes, and this submitter hasn't posted in the dozen lists I take, since > May anyway. This may save someone having to assign a bug, but perhaps > one shouldn't earn the 'mayCC' bit until some N>0 have been assigned? > > > But anyways, looking at the amount of panics he reports, most of which > > happen on rather trivial actions (as far as I can tell from my sampling > > of reports), this looks like bad hardware. > > If anyone with a hat could tell the sasamotikomi? > > I'm more concerned about process (vs PRs) and bulk spam potential than > the reporting methods of any one submitter; bugzilla is overall cool. > > cheers, Ian Ian, Please create an issue report assigned to bugmeister, with 'keyword: feature' describing the issue, and thoughts on different ways you can think of a mechanism potentially working. -- Kubilay for Bugmeister
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?540B0C87.9070005>