Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 03 Jan 2007 23:19:41 -0800
From:      Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD Installer vs RedHat Linux Fedora Core Installer?
Message-ID:  <459CAA8D.309@u.washington.edu>
In-Reply-To: <b35fa3120701032242q7708f3a1x9c0b5fca75488d62@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <ad32ec270701031142j7ed4a6dbr4690189d9f8ece3@mail.gmail.com>	<20070103211426.GA60153@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <b35fa3120701032242q7708f3a1x9c0b5fca75488d62@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sunnz wrote:

<snip>

> On the other hand, the FBSD installer is very Microsoft-ly, the WinXP
> installer doesn't have any fancy graphics at first boot, where you do
> the partition/fs-format stuff - it only display a nice Microsoft Ad
> thing when it starts actually installing, which I always leave it by
> itself anyway.

That's changing. MS is abandoning the 2000 installer and going strictly
GUI, come Vista.
- -Garrett
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFnKqNEnKyINQw/HARAsLPAJwOovkeM5f9V0qt0SLhEosRZwQw+QCfSvGc
++zZXqfxjr2GNmBHMxn8r0E=
=fJD1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?459CAA8D.309>