Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 15:47:05 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/43771: LaTeX ports mixed between print and textproc (was:Re: Do we need a new major category (latex)?) Message-ID: <20040202154705.030e59b1@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <200401282307.44488.linimon@lonesome.com> References: <20040127145518.33cd1648@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <200401282307.44488.linimon@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 23:07:44 -0600
Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote:
> One of the abandonded PRs I adopted has to do with this (ports/43771).
> In it, the question is asked, should this be a virtual category, or a
> physical one? (I might slightly favor the latter).
>
> The other question that's asked in there is whether some ports currently
> in "print" really belong in either converters, or possibly textproc. (There
> is some overlap). I'd like to get other people's opinions on whether
> those ports need repocopies, or at the least, secondary categories.
New major category "tex":
- everything related
Exceptions:
- lyx: belongs IMHO into editor
- lout: reading the pkg-descr and the hompage I don't see why it
should belong into tex... it's "LaTeX like", but that's all
Bye,
Alexander.
--
I will be available to get hired in April 2004.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040202154705.030e59b1>