From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Mar 2 14:07:46 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA05835 for chat-outgoing; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 14:07:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA05825 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 14:07:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA06970; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 14:07:35 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199703022207.OAA06970@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: Charles Henrich cc: ejs@bfd.com, jmb@freefall.freebsd.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com, taob@risc.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge) In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 02 Mar 1997 16:58:04 EST." <199703022158.QAA00720@crh.cl.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 02 Mar 1997 14:07:34 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk My motherboard is an ASUS P/I XP6NP5 and I have 60ns dram. Trying playing with your BIOS settings for memory timing. Cheers, Amancio >From The Desk Of Charles Henrich : > > > > > > I see how you are Amancio! Did you single user a nice -20 to get 396? :) > > > > > > > Nope, I took out a few transistor that I didn't need on my PPRO 8) > > > > No, I just recompile the binary without -m486 and added -finline-functions. > > Hee hee. Well that little trick only helped me margianlly I finally broke 39 5, > 395080 to be exact, fairly repeatable to. Your machine clearly has the edge, > what sort of ram speed are you running? > > -Crh > > Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@msu.edu > > http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich