Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:28:09 -0400 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>, Peter Wemm <peter@freebsd.org>, Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>, freebsd-git@freebsd.org, kensmith@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When were the stable and release branches actually created? Message-ID: <CAPyFy2DtP-Cuw24O5EeFu-Y785uRY3T6nwZP5QRXLdsYvNCGZQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfqL1mvPj2-rZXmej8oyp%2BFY19aT2yaJFLz0sqFZ4CiZCQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CANCZdfpeZrvUUfojucheKG2YfGM0L2Zmxx5=eJwXb%2BDxZM1gOA@mail.gmail.com> <CF742026-F96D-4024-82A6-0656BC44E67F@samsco.org> <CANCZdfqL1mvPj2-rZXmej8oyp%2BFY19aT2yaJFLz0sqFZ4CiZCQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 22:41, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > > We're on the same page here. We've grabbed the relatively easy 95%. If it's > easy to include, we're doing it. If it requires heroics, we're leaving it > aside. The mainline conversion is done, and Ulrich is just making sure... The effort we're spending now (iterating on the svn-git conversion) is to make sure the conversion will support / simplify future contrib/ software updates, and I believe that attempting to truncate the repo will in fact make that process harder. We're very much not aiming for perfection, and have already determined how additional history can be grafted in later and on a per-clone basis, should someone want "git blame" to show CSRG-era commits, for example. We could perhaps skip converting branches before stable/10, although it doesn't buy us too much - uqs@ is not spending much time.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2DtP-Cuw24O5EeFu-Y785uRY3T6nwZP5QRXLdsYvNCGZQ>