Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 6 Aug 2012 01:13:04 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Marco Muskus <marcomuskus@une.net.co>
Cc:        centos@centos.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208060110570.2396@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <501EE212.3090403@une.net.co>
References:  <CAFBRBcoxr5HLVipX5L5=qhEZ7pOW+4NmWJwy3GsL_DH74Fm+yQ@mail.gmail.com> <501D8A3D.1000707@une.net.co> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208051321170.21508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <501EE212.3090403@une.net.co>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
>>> with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be the 
>>> differentiator.
>> true. it is consistently slow.
>> 
>> REALLY from what tale do you people get such a statements.
>
> There is no tale, only a feature set:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zfs#Features
>

And everything everyone writes is always true.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1208060110570.2396>