Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:06:17 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Xin LI <delphij@freebsd.org>, Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@freebsd.org>, Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Subject: Re: truss status Message-ID: <20060724130524.K44945@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <200607241336.29993.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <200607210845.k6L8j0Ep026008@repoman.freebsd.org> <86ac6z4xu1.fsf@xps.des.no> <200607241228.56938.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200607241336.29993.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Monday 24 July 2006 12:28, Daniel O'Connor wrote: >> ktrace is a good disk filling service if you run it like this. >> >> truss IS more convenient. >> >> If kdump could write to a pipe it would be almost as convenient. > > Oh, and one more thing.. Ktrace is almost useless "out of the box" because > for any non-trivial operation you run out of requests. > > I usually have to bump up kern.ktrace.request_pool by an order of magnitude. This has been fixed in 7.x, but I did not MFC it before 6.1 because I wanted it to see more testing. We probably should MFC it for 6.2. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060724130524.K44945>