From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec 16 00:11:50 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B065E16A494
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 00:11:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from andrew@areilly.bpc-users.org)
Received: from omta04sl.mx.bigpond.com (omta04sl.mx.bigpond.com
	[144.140.93.156])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84EAC43C9D
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 00:10:05 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from andrew@areilly.bpc-users.org)
Received: from oaamta04sl.mx.bigpond.com ([144.132.228.157])
	by omta04sl.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id
	<20061216001147.KWWR2480.omta04sl.mx.bigpond.com@oaamta04sl.mx.bigpond.com>
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 00:11:47 +0000
Received: from areilly.bpa.nu ([144.132.228.157])
	by oaamta04sl.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP
	id <20061216001147.HGIL5602.oaamta04sl.mx.bigpond.com@areilly.bpa.nu>
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 00:11:47 +0000
Received: (qmail 57392 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2006 00:11:32 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO duncan.reilly.home) (127.0.0.1)
	by localhost with SMTP; 16 Dec 2006 00:11:32 -0000
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:11:32 +1100
From: Andrew Reilly <andrew@areilly.bpc-users.org>
To: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net>
Message-ID: <20061216111132.191479b1@duncan.reilly.home>
In-Reply-To: <op.tkl2cf0n9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
References: <20061214085727.15bf3750@duncan.reilly.home>
	<op.tkl2cf0n9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.2 (GTK+ 2.10.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd6.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: How to compile nautilus with debug symbols from ports?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 00:11:50 -0000

On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:18:05 -0600
"Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> wrote:

> > So: what's happened to nautilus' .core file?  Is there some fancy
> > clean-up mechanism going on?  I imagine so: that must be how
> > bugbuddy gets invoked in the first place.  Can this be overriden
> > so that I can get a core file to point gdb at?
> >
> > Secondly: is there a convenient port-build global knob for
> > turning on debugging symbols?  Anything more complicated than
> > CFLAGS+=-g in /etc/make.conf?  
> 
> See in http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/develfaq.html#q3 for what to put  
> in make.conf.

Summary: no, besides -g in CFLAGS in make.conf we also need
STRIP=, to stop the symbol tables from being stripped.  However
that isn't going to help, because we have to track a completely
different "developer" GNOME repository in order to get something
that will actually dump a core when it bombs...

I'm afraid that last part sounds like too much trouble for this
marginally interested user.  Sorry.

-- 
Andrew