From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 24 21:15:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1AC116D; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:15:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from forward9l.mail.yandex.net (forward9l.mail.yandex.net [84.201.143.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8615A192C; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:15:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp13.mail.yandex.net (smtp13.mail.yandex.net [95.108.130.68]) by forward9l.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id BD92BE60EBF; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 01:15:05 +0400 (MSK) Received: from smtp13.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp13.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 583BDE40057; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 01:15:05 +0400 (MSK) Received: from unknown (unknown [178.76.234.16]) by smtp13.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id zkTyHekikJ-F4smiQ2l; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 01:15:04 +0400 (using TLSv1 with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client certificate not present) X-Yandex-Uniq: a3dd7a5c-b8aa-49e0-bb51-e6cf02578c17 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1390598104; bh=u07wdrhTZJ06MUJ5mmdc5lG5OuakVZEB53vOA/C7oK0=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=h0fc3OwwXSJM9C5VoyfN2JtQA5wCy/Ho7ar2OsUDKpPsXZg2TJwFLBuMQKWG/85i3 38FC+TxQe1W7zq3QxeeZqjNXWTvNsJVVFgesIQC5GdThTq1cnN3YgYcsR4/YKHS40+ +Lr4tql6mzpdeN9psqR6vr5XQxV1lJzON1XtZXMM= Authentication-Results: smtp13.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru Message-ID: <52E2D7D0.40908@yandex.ru> Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 01:14:56 +0400 From: Ruslan Makhmatkhanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r340925 - head/devel/py-singledispatch References: <201401241906.s0OJ64Gf078576@svn.freebsd.org> <52E2C6DE.6030900@yandex.ru> <20140124203226.GA1396@medusa.sysfault.org> In-Reply-To: <20140124203226.GA1396@medusa.sysfault.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:15:14 -0000 Marcus von Appen wrote on 25.01.2014 00:32: > On, Fri Jan 24, 2014, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > >> Marcus von Appen wrote on 24.01.2014 23:06: >>> Author: mva >>> Date: Fri Jan 24 19:06:04 2014 >>> New Revision: 340925 >>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/340925 >>> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r340925/ >>> >>> Log: >>> - Convert USE_PYDISTUTILS=easy_install to yes >>> >>> Modified: >>> head/devel/py-singledispatch/Makefile >>> >>> Modified: head/devel/py-singledispatch/Makefile >>> ============================================================================== >>> --- head/devel/py-singledispatch/Makefile Fri Jan 24 19:04:50 2014 (r340924) >>> +++ head/devel/py-singledispatch/Makefile Fri Jan 24 19:06:04 2014 (r340925) >>> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ COMMENT= provides single-dispatch generi >>> LICENSE= MIT >>> >>> USE_PYTHON= yes >>> -USE_PYDISTUTILS= easy_install >>> +USE_PYDISTUTILS= yes >>> PYDISTUTILS_AUTOPLIST= yes >>> >>> .include >> >> Marcus, shouldn't changes like that follow PORTREVISION bump or I >> misunderstand something? > > The package contents change, but it does not have any influence on > dependent ports nor on functionality nor on requirements. Thus > I do not see it as necessary to bump the port revision. > > I'm fine however with bumping PORTREVISION, if that's the desired > approach of dealing with that. > > Cheers > Marcus I think it's better to bump to ease bug reports investigation - there will be no situation where users and ports tree will have different packages. -- Regards, Ruslan T.O.S. Of Reality