From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct  1 14:33:54 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1E816A419
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon,  1 Oct 2007 14:33:54 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from Lee@Dilkie.com)
Received: from spock.dilkie.com (spock.dilkie.com [206.51.1.40])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B45013C458
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon,  1 Oct 2007 14:33:53 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from Lee@Dilkie.com)
Received: from [10.39.164.100] ([216.191.234.70]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by spock.dilkie.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l91EGu8E022386
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Mon, 1 Oct 2007 10:16:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from Lee@Dilkie.com)
Message-ID: <47010153.9070303@Dilkie.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 10:16:51 -0400
From: Lee Dilkie <Lee@Dilkie.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Matt Dawson <matt@chronos.org.uk>
References: <200710011331.06491.matt@chronos.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <200710011331.06491.matt@chronos.org.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 206.51.1.40
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: imap-uw-2006j_2,1, cclient-2006g_1,1 PAM problems?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:33:54 -0000

I had to roll back as well.

Best I could tell was that the credentials presented to pam were the
userid and userid (instead of password), at least that's what the logs
looked like to me.

-lee


Matt Dawson wrote:
> Is anyone else having problems with PAM authentication on these ports? I've 
> had to roll back to the 2004g_1,1 versions of both. 
>
> Information is a bit thin; all I can tell you is that they both seem to 
> compile correctly and TLS works fine. Only when the client comes to 
> authenticate is there a problem. With a known good auth pair, the server 
> returns BAD LOGIN. The server also no longer supports LOGIN, only accepting 
> clear text. Rolling back cures this immediately with no change 
> in /etc/pam.d/pop3.
>
> Any suggestions?
>