From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 22:02:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F891065690; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:02:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF148FC1B; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:02:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id E46F31A3C39; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:02:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:02:29 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20090126220229.GR5889@elvis.mu.org> References: <200901260947.32870.jhb@freebsd.org> <20090126203824.GO5889@elvis.mu.org> <200901261640.59239.jhb@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200901261640.59239.jhb@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trimming the default /boot/device.hints X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:02:42 -0000 * John Baldwin [090126 13:57] wrote: > On Monday 26 January 2009 3:38:24 pm Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > There's no way to conditionally include them based on if > > ISA is present? > > No, but I dare you to show me a box with ISA expansion slots that you plan to > run 8.0 on. :) Or rather, I dare you to show me _enough_ of said boxes to > where removing these hints from the default set will inconvenience more users > than the folks having their ethernet come up as le1 in vmware guests. :) I agree with you, I was just wondering if it was just a matter of a few lines of code somehow so that some enthusiast who wants to play with FreeBSD on some old piece of junk doesn't get some cryptic error that sort of reduces them to "toggling in load.conf tunables at the console". :) no big deal. -- - Alfred Perlstein